|
Workers’
Compensation – General Information
Index Workers’
Compensation Facts and Figures History
of Workers’ Compensation The Actual Purpose of Workers’
Compensation Employers Must Carry Insurance No Retribution for Filing a Claim Workers’ Compensation Fraud Contested Cases
Workers’
Compensation Facts and Figures
- Workers’ Compensation traces its
origins back to Germany, where Chancellor Otto Von
Bismarck introduced a compulsory state run accident compensation system in
1884. The program was financed by workers and
employers.
- Over 16,000 workplace injuries or illnesses occur each day in
the United States.
- Almost 6,000 workplace fatalities occur within the United States
Every Year.
- 98% of employees in the US – over 192 million - are
covered under the workers’ compensation system.
- Formerly known as Workmans’
Compensation, in the 1970’s states started modifying their laws to call it
Workers’ Compensation – a more gender neutral phrase.
- In
1911 Wisconsin
was the first state to pass workers’ compensation legislation, and by 1948 every
state had some form of workers’ comp law on the books.
Return to top
History
of Workers’ Compensation
Workers' Compensation is a no-fault
system of social legislation, first instituted in the United States shortly after the
turn of the century, in response to serious societal problems caused by a
dramatic rise in the number of people injured in industrial settings. Prior to
the enactment of workers comp laws (called workmens'
compensation or workmans’
compensation in earlier days) the only means for an injured worker to
recover any compensation to pay for medical expenses and loss of employment
income, was to hire a lawyer and prove
negligence or malice on the part of the employer. Of course, it was rare for an employee to
even have enough money or knowledge to hire a lawyer in the first place, and
then proving negligence was as difficult then as it is now. In most cases, the injury was not the fault
of the worker or the employee – there were a lot of dangerous jobs in those
days, and most accidents were simply accidents.
Even if the injured worker's lawyer was
able to establish negligence on the part of the employer or another party,
which was often not the case, the road to recovery was drawn out and expensive,
and an employee might well lose his/her home, health and family waiting for
relief. Supporting a large number of
indigent, injured workers became a drain upon society. State legislatures
across the United States
began to propose the adoption of workers comp laws designed to withdraw law
suits against employers from the Court system, and to provide some measure of
swift compensation to the injured worker, regardless of fault.
The first state law was passed in Wisconsin
in 1911. By 1948, all
states had enacted some kind of workers' compensation law.
Each state enacts its own set of
workers’ compensation laws, and there is no Federal control over
individual states’ workers comp laws.
This makes it complicated for workers who experience a workplace injury,
for employers who have employees in multiple states, and for insurance carriers
who must abide by different laws and rules in each state. Because the rules are not particularly
straightforward, it is almost always advisable that an injured worker retain an
attorney to ensure his rights and maximize his award. Some states have taken the step of limiting
the fees an attorney may charge when pursuing a Workers’ Compensation claim on
behalf of an injured worker. Other
states allow attorney’s fees as high as 40% of the value of the claim.
Return to top
The Actual Purpose of Workers’
Compensation
In the United States
most employees who are injured on the job have an absolute right to medical
care for that injury, and in many cases monetary payments to compensate for
resulting temporary or permanent disabilities.
Unfortunately injuries do occur quite often in the course of employment,
and some of these injuries are very serious and life-altering. Some even result in death.
The primary goal of the system is to get the employee back to work, even
in a limited capacity, as quickly as possible.
If the employee is seriously disabled and cannot return to work, the
intent of the law is to cover the employee’s medical expenses and to provide
replacement wages so that the employee does not become indigent and a burden on
the state. Some injured workers have a
misconception that a workplace injury is a ticket to financial independence,
which is not the intent of the law.
Return to top
Employers Must Carry Insurance
Most employers are required to carry workers' compensation insurance, and
in most states employers risk heavy financial penalties if they fail to carry
the insurance. In many states there are
public uninsured employer funds to pay benefits to workers employed by
companies who illegally fail to purchase insurance. Insurance policies are
available to employers through commercial insurance companies: if the employer
is deemed an excessive risk, it can obtain coverage through an assigned-risk
program.
Large employers may save money by being self-insured. Each state has solvency requirements for
self-insured employers. About 20% of all
employees in the United
States work for employers who are self-insured.
In the vast majority of states, workers' compensation is solely provided by
private insurance companies. 12 states
operate a state fund (which serves as a model to private insurers and insures
state employees), and a handful have state-owned monopolies. To keep the state funds from crowding out
private insurers, they are generally required to act as assigned-risk programs
or insurers of last resort, and they can only write workers' compensation
policies. In contrast, private insurers
can turn away the worst risks and can write comprehensive insurance packages
covering general liability, natural disasters, and so on. The largest state fund is California's State Compensation
Insurance Fund. The federal
government pays its workers' compensation obligations for its own employees
through Congressional budget appropriations.
Return to top
No Retribution for Filing a Claim
It is illegal in some states (although not in others) for an employer to
terminate an employee for reporting a workplace injury or for filing a workers'
compensation claim. Most states also
prohibit refusing employment for having previously filed a workers'
compensation claim.
Return to top
Workers’ Compensation Fraud
It is of course illegal to falsely claim workers' compensation benefits. Some employers hire private
investigators to videotape claimants surreptitiously; some of these
videos have shown employees engaging in sports or other strenuous physical
activity despite disability. Almost
every day throughout the United
States, someone is convicted of collecting
on a fraudulent claim.
Return to top
Contested Cases
After an injury occurs, the Insurance Carrier appoints a Claims Administrator
who has the authority to oversee the course of medical treatment and the
distribution of payments to the injured worker.
There is a tension built into the relationship between the worker who is
legitimately injured and the insurance carrier who must pay the medical bills
and other compensation. Assuming no
fraud or malice on either side, the injured worker wants quality medical treatment
to enable a full recovery, and the insurance carrier wants to reach that goal
as inexpensively as possible within the law.
Disputes arise when the Claims Administrator contests employee claims,
and conversely, injured employees often feel they have been treated unfairly by
the Claims Administrator.
Most claims are handled smoothly, but even so many Workers’ Compensation
cases end up in court. In the vast
majority of states, Workers' Compensation disputes begin with a special state
administrative agency that hears the facts of the case and makes a ruling on
what benefits should and should not be paid.
Either the injured worker or the Employer / Insurance Carrier may appeal
the agency’s decision, and this is typically handled first through an appeals
board, and then finally in the state court system if there is no resolution. Often when the court decides against the
original ruling of the state agency, they will remand the case back to the
agency for reconsideration.
Return
to top
|